Skip to main content

CORPORATE CHATS: Applicability of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) on Philippine Entities



Client inquired about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and how the provisions of the law could apply to a Philippine company like their company.

FCPA prohibits U.S persons and, in some cases, foreign persons from corruptly offering, authorizing, or making payments, or giving anything of value, to any foreign official or political parties for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.


FCPA has two main provisions - the anti-bribery provisions which are enforced by the US Department of Justice and Accounting and Internal Controls Provisions enforced by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


For the Anti-Bribery Offense, the covered persons are: (i) U.S. persons and companies, (ii) "Issuer" (i.e. any company with shares listed on U.S. Stock exchanges and (iii) any person - foreign companies, their officers, directors, employees, foreign national not resident in US that take an "act in furtherance" while in the U.S.


A domestic corporation with a foreign mother affiliated corporation is covered under the third group being a foreign company affiliate of US company and has expatriates or persons doing an act in furtherance of the U.S. company. With this in mind, we put the FCPA provisions on those contracts that will have involvement of U.S. persons or company in terms of actually releasing the money for the project.


For the FCPA Accounting provisions, the company is required to keep detailed books, records, and accounts that fairly and accurately reflect transactions and dispositions of assets and must maintain internal accounting controls to ensure financial records are accurate for external reporting,that access to assets is controlled, and that books are reasonably audited.


Some specific problem areas that may implicate the company with the FCPA and thus contracts that would be executed must contain the FCPA provision. It includes ANY contract calling for:


- use of a third party (consultant, agent, broker, contractor, service provider, vendors ) who will coordinate with government officials or government entity in providing the service


RED FLAGs: Use of an intermediary who has a questionable reputation, is known to have connections with the government officials, holds government (even honorary) position or is related to someone who does, was recommended by government, charges fees in excess of fair market value for services provided, request payment in cash, in a third country or other unusual arrangements, or refuses to make representations required by the company.


- charitable contributions


RED FLAGS: Charities, projects or contractors recommended by government officials, donations under direction or suggestion of a government official, or charities headed or managed by government officials


- Hospitality (provision of meals, expensive entertainment and entertainment disquised as training/ seminars,overseas trips of government officials with lavish accommodations,sightseeing and per diems)


RED FLAGS: meals, lodging, transportation and entertainment, which are excessive or "lavish" under local standards, repeated instances of meals and entertainment of lesser value, requests to cover expenses for family members, or hospitality with no legitimate connection to promotion or demonstration of products or services, or the execution or performance of a contract.

Comments

Unknown said…
FCPA danger analysis is tough in M&A deals due to the substantial FCPA reach. Recognition and also associated with FCPA-related exposures and also evaluation from the danger needs to be an requirement of almost any sufficient research in a international M&A deal--there will likely Corrupt practices be severe penalties associated with exposures that occur coming from receiving or perhaps promoting property that will create a take advantage of damaged practices, plus a individual fairness mentor must create evaluation with this danger extremely important. you can read more http://mordo-crosswords-solution.blogspot.com/2014/07/corrupt-practices.html
James Abram said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
James Abram said…
Thanks for sharing! For the best lawyer Manila, visit: http://ndvlaw.com/.

Popular posts from this blog

PROPERTY POINT: Salvage Zones Utilization

Client wants to know if it can utilize an area constituting a salvage zone. Under Article 51 of the Presidential Decree No. 1067 , otherwise known as “ The Water Code of the Philippines ”, Salvage Zone is defined as “the zone of three (3) meters in urban areas, twenty (20) meters in agricultural areas and forty (40) meters in forest areas, along their margins, subject to the easement of public use in the interest of recreation, navigation, flotage, fishing and salvage. No person shall be allowed to stay in this zone longer than what is necessary for recreation, navigation, floatage, fishing or salvage or to build structures of any kind ”. The Philippine Ports Authority has jurisdiction over all shorelines or salvage zones. It cannot, however, grant an exemption for the individual personal use of the shoreline. Based on our representation with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR ), we learned that the available option is for client to file a Foreshore L

PROPERTY POINT: CONSULTA

A certain Register of Deeds denied the registration of the Deed of Absolute Sale executed by a corporation sole on the ground that “Court Approval is necessary since the Vendor being a corporation sole pursuant to Section 113 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 68 , the Corporation Code of the Philippines .” Pursuant to Section 117 of Presidential Decree No. 1529 , otherwise known as the Property Registration Decree , we elevate the matter to Land Registration Authority (LRA) by way of consulta . BASIS OF CONSULTA: Section 117 of the Property Registration Decree reads – Section 117. Procedure. When the Register of Deeds is in doubt with regard to the proper step to be taken or memorandum to be made in pursuance of any deed, mortgage or other instrument presented to him for registration, or where any party in interest does not agree with the action taken by the Register of Deeds with reference to any such instrument, the question shall be submitted to the Commissioner of Land Registr

NULLITY OF MARRIAGE: Lack of Marriage License Due To False Affidavit of Cohabitation

Interfering In-Laws Caused the Marriage Breakdown @Alain Atienza Tagpuno This petition involves a Declaration of Nullity of Marriage between Petitioner J and Respondent L on the ground t hat the marriage was solemnized without a marriage license, anchored on the falsity of the period of five (5) consecutive years of cohabitation stated in the Affidavit of cohabitation. FACTUAL SCENARIO: J, is a cameraman for TV shows that air over PTV 4, while L was working as the head writer for the same TV shows.  D uring their initial meeting, J found L to be friendly, kind and intelligent, being a graduate of Mass Communications from the Ateneo de Manila University. As J  and L  always worked together on the same production, their mutual attraction for each other grew. With constant teasing from M, their Production Manager, and co-workers, J   and L became sweethearts sometime in the latter part of 2001. Sometime in April 2003, while J ,   L and M